Uncovering the Most Effective Pedagogical Techniques for Math Education Using Machine Learning

Said Elnaffar - Canadian University Dubai, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Mohamed Fawey - Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime Transport Egypt


Citation Format:



DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.62527/joiv.8.3-2.3123

Abstract


Many new math educators express that their first years in the teaching field are extremely challenging. They struggle to discover and apply the most effective teaching techniques and behaviors, often without the support of more experienced colleagues. In this study, we use machine learning to find the strategies that novice teachers can adopt to enhance their teaching effectiveness. The core aim is to uncover the relationship between teachers’ performance, as assessed by student evaluations, and their pedagogical methods. These strategies are derived from the final decision tree model, which is trained on a large dataset of empirical data from schools. The data consists of input from 72 math teachers of grades 7-9 and their students in Dubai, used to train two decision tree models: a classification tree and a regression tree. The structure of these trees is analyzed to identify and rank the effectiveness of nine teaching techniques—such as Visualization, Practice, Math Rules, Gamification, Collaboration, Problem-Solving, Case Studies, Assessments, and Language Switching—and four behavioral methods—such as Inspiration, Engagement, Entertainment, and Bonding— in relation to the Student Evaluation Index (SEI), which is derived from student feedback. Results indicate that techniques such as "gamification" and "inspirational behavior" are consistently associated with higher SEI scores across different tree configurations. However, factors such as the demographics and culture of both students and teachers may need to be considered when generalizing these findings to other regions of the world.


Keywords


Education; Machine Learning; Decision Tree; Mathematics; Professional Development.

Full Text:

PDF

References


“The world needs almost 69 million new teachers to reach the 2030 education goals,” UNESCO Institute for Statistics, Oct. 2016, [Online]. Available: https://uis.unesco.org/en/files/fs39-world-needs-almost-69-million-new-teachers-reach-2030-education-goals-2016-en-pdf

A. M. Jarrah, “The challenges faced by pre-service mathematics teachers during their teaching practice in the UAE: implications for teacher education programs,” International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 23–34, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.26803/ijlter.19.7.2, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.7.2

F. K. Fadlelmula, “Enablers and obstacles in teaching and learning of mathematics,” LUMAT International Journal on Math Science and Technology Education, vol. 10, no. 2, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.31129/lumat.10.2.1627, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.31129/lumat.10.2.1627

L. Darling-Hammond, M. Hyler, and M. Gardner, “Effective teacher professional development,” Jun. 2017, doi: 10.54300/122.311, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311

E. Alpaydin, Introduction to Machine Learning, third edition, 3rd ed. MIT Press, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://dl.matlabyar.com/siavash/ML/Book/Ethem%20Alpaydin-Introduction%20to%20Machine%20Learning-The%20MIT%20Press%20(2014).pdf

L. Chen, P. Chen, and Z. Lin, “Artificial intelligence in education: a review,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 75264–75278, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1109/access.2020.2988510, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2988510

M. Chassignol, A. Khoroshavin, A. Klimova, and A. Bilyatdinova, “Artificial Intelligence trends in education: a narrative overview,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 136, pp. 16–24, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2018.08.233, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.08.233

M. Wollowski, “A survey of current practice and teaching of AI,” Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 30, no. 1, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.1609/aaai.v30i1.9857, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v30i1.9857

E. M. Ganyaupfu, “Teaching methods and students’ academic performance,” International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, vol. 2, no. 9, Sep. 2013, [Online]. Available: https://researchgate.net/publication/264124430_Teaching_Methods_and_Students'_Academic_Performance

R. Tripathi, “Importance and improvements in teaching-learning process through effective evaluation methodologies,” ESSENCE – International Journal for Environmental Rehabilitation and Conservation, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 7–16, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.31786/09756272.18.9.2.202, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.31786/09756272.18.9.2.202

E. Akdemir and C. Özçelik, “The investigation of the attitudes of teachers towards using student centered teaching methods and techniques,” Universal Journal of Educational Research, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1147–1153, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.13189/ujer.2019.070427, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070427

S. Petrina, Advanced teaching methods for the technology classroom. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2007. doi: 10.4018/978-1-59904-337-1, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-337-1

P. Sokkhey and T. Okazaki, “Comparative study of prediction models for high school student performance in mathematics,” IEIE Transactions on Smart Processing and Computing, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 394–404, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.5573/ieiespc.2019.8.5.394, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.5573/ieiespc.2019.8.5.394

L. Dinh, J. Sohl-Dickstein, and S. Bengio, “Density estimation using Real NVP,” arXiv (Cornell University), Jan. 2016, doi: 10.48550/arxiv.1605.08803, [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.08803

R. Russell, Machine learning step-by-step guide to implement machine learning algorithms with Python. 2010. [Online]. Available: https://eprints.triatmamulya.ac.id/1654/1/Machine%20Learning_%20Step-by-Step%20Guide%20To%20Implement%20Machine%20Learning%20Algorithms%20with%20Python.pdf

A. MO, O. AO, and W. WF, “Teachers’ performance evaluation in higher educational institution using data mining technique,” International Journal of Applied Information Systems, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 10–15, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.5120/ijais2016451524, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.5120/ijais2016451524

M. Ünal, “Preferences of teaching methods and techniques in mathematics with reasons,” Universal Journal of Educational Research, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 194–202, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.13189/ujer.2017.050204, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.050204

M. Joubert, “Using digital technologies in mathematics teaching: developing an understanding of the landscape using three ‘grand challenge’ themes,” Educational Studies in Mathematics, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 341–359, Sep. 2012, doi: 10.1007/s10649-012-9430-x, [Online]. Available: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10649-012-9430-x

Y. Wardat, M. Tashtoush, R. Alali, and S. Saleh, “Artificial intelligence in education: mathematics teachers’ perspectives, practices and challenges,” Iraqi Journal for Computer Science and Mathematics, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 60–77, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.52866/ijcsm.2024.05.01.004, [Online]. Available: https://www.iasj.net/iasj/download/6b0326882fa58c5b

J. Aliyu, S. Osman, M. F. Daud, and J. A. Kumar, “Mathematics teachers’ pedagogy through technology: a systematic literature review,” International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 323–341, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.26803/ijlter.20.1.18, [Online]. Available: http://www.ijlter.net/index.php/ijlter/article/view/182

S. A. Pise, “Transforming mathematics education with technology,” An International Peer Reviewed Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies, p. 17, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.srjis.com/downloadPdf/14692718247.26-Shanti-Pise.pdf/1563/53&ved=2ahUKEwiZr6aAsL-IAxVDi_0HHZ3yMGMQFnoECBQQAQ&usg=AOvVaw3WeQmEz2zEWPGViFEwzHw2

L. F. Robles, H. A. Moretón, J. A. Cendón, M. C. Limas, and L. P. Alonso, “Learning process analysis using machine learning techniques,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 34, no. 3, p. 9, 2018, doi: 10.31219/osf.io/srhz9, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/srhz9

Z. Yujiao, L. W. Ang, S. Shaomin, and S. Palaniappan, “Dropout prediction model for college students in MOOCs based on weighted Multi-feature and SVM,” Journal of Informatics and Web Engineering, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 29–42, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.33093/jiwe.2023.2.2.3, [Online]. Available: https://journals.mmupress.com/index.php/jiwe/article/view/557

T. A. Khan, R. Sadiq, Z. Shahid, M. M. Alam, and M. M. Su’ud, “Sentiment analysis using support vector machine and random forest,” Journal of Informatics and Web Engineering, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 67–75, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.33093/jiwe.2024.3.1.5, [Online]. Available: https://journals.mmupress.com/index.php/jiwe/article/view/598

S. M. Wajid, T. Javed, and M. M. Su’ud, “Ensemble learning-powered URL phishing detection: a performance driven approach,” Journal of Informatics and Web Engineering, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 134–145, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.33093/jiwe.2024.3.2.10, [Online]. Available: https://journals.mmupress.com/index.php/jiwe/article/view/881

T. S. Tajamul and K. Aman, “Unveiling the efficacy of AI-based algorithms in phishing attack detection,” Journal of Informatics and Web Engineering, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 116–133, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.33093/jiwe.2024.3.2.9, [Online]. Available: https://journals.mmupress.com/index.php/jiwe/article/view/878

H. Ng, M. S. Jalani, T. T. V. Yap, and V. T. Goh, “Performance of sentiment classification on tweets of clothing brands,” Journal of Informatics and Web Engineering, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 16–22, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.33093/jiwe.2022.1.1.2, [Online]. Available: https://journals.mmupress.com/index.php/jiwe/article/view/267

J. S. A. Tan, Z. C. Embi, and N. Hashim, “Comparison of machine learning methods for calories burn prediction,” Journal of Informatics and Web Engineering, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 182–191, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.33093/jiwe.2024.3.1.12, [Online]. Available: https://journals.mmupress.com/index.php/jiwe/article/view/800

S. T. Lim, J. Y. Yuan, K. W. Khaw, and X. Chew, “Predicting travel insurance purchases in an insurance firm through machine learning methods after COVID-19,” Journal of Informatics and Web Engineering, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 43–58, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.33093/jiwe.2023.2.2.4, [Online]. Available: https://journals.mmupress.com/index.php/jiwe/article/view/619

J. O. Victor, X. Chew, K. W. Khaw, and M. H. Lee, “A cost-based dual ConvNet-Attention transfer learning model for ECG heartbeat classification,” Journal of Informatics and Web Engineering, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 90–110, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.33093/jiwe.2023.2.2.7, [Online]. Available: https://journals.mmupress.com/index.php/jiwe/article/view/652

T.-J. Law, C.-Y. Ting, H. Ng, H.-N. Goh, and A. Quek, “Ensemble-SMOTE: mitigating class imbalance in graduate on time detection,” Journal of Informatics and Web Engineering, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 229–250, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.33093/jiwe.2024.3.2.17, [Online]. Available: https://journals.mmupress.com/index.php/jiwe/article/view/1076

C. Susaie, C.-K. Tan, and P.-Y. Goh, “Learning Experience with LearnwithEmma,” Journal of Informatics and Web Engineering, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 30–44, Sep. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.33093/jiwe.2022.1.2.3.