Students' Behavior in the Learning Process Using Zoom Meeting Media: Problems and Solutions
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.62527/joiv.8.3.2226
Abstract
Recent digital technologies have increased the flexibility of learning. Online learning is now seen as a good alternative, not a force anymore. Among all online learning media that can aid, Zoom is an interactive online learning media mainly used by lecturers to carry out synchronous learning processes when offline lectures cannot be carried out. Using Zoom, lecturers and students can interact synchronously, like face-to-face learning in class. Many studies have been conducted to see the impacts of online learning on students’ learning behaviors using various media, yet studies on how students behave while learning using Zoom have not yet been explored in more detail. This research aims to reveal how students behave in the learning process by using Zoom in English classes through a survey study. Data were collected through a questionnaire delivered online to some 142 English Department students of Universitas Negeri Padang who experienced online learning. They voluntarily took part in this survey. Carrying quantitative analysis, the research showed that most students did not follow the Zoom-mediated learning process as well as they did face-to-face learning, which was carried out offline, for various reasons. Several positive and negative behaviors were found when implementing the learning process using Zoom. Therefore, for the learning process to run well, it is necessary to agree on the ethics of the learning process by using Zoom. The findings of this research can provide a reference for making conventional ethics of online learning using Zoom or other media.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
M. Stephan, S. Markus, and M. Gläser-Zikuda, “Students’ achievement emotions and online learning in teacher education,” Front. Educ., vol. 4, no. October, pp. 1–12, 2019, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2019.00109.
M. Zaim, H. Ardi, N. Rosita, and M. Zakiyah, “Learning Loss in English Speaking Class : A Case Study on Language Acquisition in Online Learning at Higher Education,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 633–650, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://www.e-iji.net/dosyalar/iji_2023_4_36.pdf.
B. M. Nehe, “Students’ Perception on Google Meet Video Conferencing Platform During English Speaking Class in Pandemic Era,” English Rev. J. English Educ., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 93–104, 2021, doi: 10.25134/erjee.v10i1.5359.
H. Pratama, M. Nor, A. Azman, G. K. Kassymova, and S. Shakizat, “The trend in using online meeting applications for learning during the period of pandemic covid-19: a literature review,” J. Innov. Educ. Cult. Res., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 58–68, 2020, doi: 10.46843/jiecr.v1i2.15.
J. S. Lee, “Affective variables and informal digital learning of English: Keys to willingness to communicate in a second language,” Australas. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 168–182, 2019.
Z. M. Z. Monggilo et al., Cakap Bermedia Digital. 2021.
S. Astuti, N. Prananingrum, L. Rahmiaji, L. Nurhajati, L. Lotulung, and N. Kurnia, Budaya Bermedia Digital. 2021.
F. Kusumastuti, S. I. Astuti, M. A. Birowo, L. E. P. Hartanti, N. M. R. Amanda, and N. Kurnia, Etis Bermedia Digital. 2021.
G. J. Adikara et al., Aman bermedia digital. 2021.
“What is Zoom Video Conference?,” Zoom Support, 2023. https://support.zoom.us/hc/en-us/articles/4420426401037-What-is-Zoom-Video-Conferencing- (accessed Aug. 20, 2023).
J. Novak, C. Bottorff, and R. Watts, “Google Meet Vs. Zoom,” Forbes Advisor, 2023. https://zoom.us/pricing (accessed Aug. 20, 2023).
F. Firman, R. Alef, and M. Eric, “Use Of Zoom Meeting Applications to Memorize the Qur’an Online,” J. Int. Inspire Educ. Technol., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 99–110, 2022, doi: 10.55849/jiiet.v1i2.92.
Y. Astika and M. Zaim, “Learning Loss in Online Learning for Writing Class,” J. English Lang. Teach., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 524–535, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.24036/jelt.v11i4.120406.
S. Aisyah and Y. Tiarina, “Learning Loss in Speaking Skill from Psychology Point of View,” J. English Lang. Teach., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 650–656, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.24036/jelt.v12i3.123234.
F. Irmada and I. Yatri, “Keefektifan Pembelajaran Online Melalui Zoom Meeting di Masa Pandemi bagi Mahasiswa,” J. Basicedu, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 2423–2429, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://jbasic.org/index.php/basicedu/article/view/1245.
G. Far-Far, “Efektifitas Penggunaan Aplikasi Zoom Meeting dalam Pembelajaran,” Istor. J. Pendidik. dan Sej., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2021.
N. R. Muliadi, N. M. Ratminingsih, and N. P. E. Marsakawati, “THE POLITENESS STRATEGIES APPLIED BY STUDENTS IN THE CONTEXT OF CLASSROOM IN VOCATIONAL SCHOOL,” Ling. Sci., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 77–89, 2023.
N. H. Sa’idah and T. Toyyibah, “How EFL teacher Modelling Politeness: Pragmatic Analysis of Classroom Interaction,” Alsuna J. Arab. English Lang., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2022, doi: 10.31538/alsuna.v5i1.1838.
R. Febriansyah, “The Power of Politeness Strategies in EFL Student-Teacher Interaction: Teacher’s Gender Perspective,” IJET (Indonesian J. English Teaching), vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 125–135, 2021, doi: 10.15642/ijet2.2021.10.2.125-135.
D. M. Cutler and A. Lleras-Muney, “Understanding Differences in Health Behaviors by Education NIH Public Access,” J Heal. Econ, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1–28, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2009.10.003.
E. Simbolon, M. Ega, A. Tri, and C. Fajariyanto, “Pembentukan Karakter Peserta Didik Melalui Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Katolik Menggunakan Zoom Meeting di Era Pandemi Covid 19,” J. Selid. (Seputar Penelit. Pendidik. Keagamaan), vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 9–19, 2022.
R. H. Nuary, “Analysis of Students Learning Ethics in Online Learning via Zoom in Mathematical Communication Ability at Senior High School Bunda Kandung Jakarta,” J. Instr. Math., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 36–43, 2022, doi: 10.37640/jim.v3i1.1027.
R. Zakiah, D. Mulyani, and D. Surana, “Analisis Mengenai Pembelajaran Akhlak Berbasis Zoom Meeting di Kelas V DTA Al-Barokah,” Bandung Conf. Ser. Islam. Educ., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 47–52, 2023, doi: 10.29313/bcsied.v3i1.5717.
J. Montgomery, “Video Meeting Etiquette: 7 Tips to Ensure a Great Attendee Experience,” Zoom Blog, 2019. https://blog.zoom.us/video-meeting-etiquette-tips/ (accessed Nov. 27, 2019).
V. Rane, “VIRTUAL ETIQUETTES FOR LIBRARIANS IN THE NEW NORMAL,” GNIMS - Int. e-Journal Libr. Sci., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 954–961, 2022.
A. MacLeod et al., “‘There’s an Etiquette to Zoom That’s Not Really Present In-Person’: A Qualitative Study Showing How the Mute Button Shapes Virtual Postpartum Support for New Parents,” Qual. Health Res., vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 1005–1016, 2023, doi: 10.1177/10497323231187541.
K. Okabe-Miyamoto, E. Durnell, R. T. Howell, and M. Zizi, “Video conferencing during emergency distance learning impacted student emotions during COVID-19,” Comput. Hum. Behav. Reports, vol. 7, p. 100199, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100199.
F. M. Azmi, H. N. Khan, and A. M. Azmi, “The impact of virtual learning on students’ educational behavior and pervasiveness of depression among university students due to the COVID-19 pandemic,” Global. Health, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2022, doi: 10.1186/s12992-022-00863-z.
Taswiyah and A. Imron, “Student Behavior Towards Online Learning Systems During the Covid-19 Pandemic,” Social Science Research Network (SSRN), 2021. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3963078.
Y. P. Lin, “Student Behavior in an Online Learning Environment: A Small Sample Study,” in Behavioral-Based Interventions for Improving Public Policies, V. Mihăilă, Ed. IGI Global, 2021, pp. 75–94.
S. Krishnakumari, C. Subathra, and K. Arul, “A descriptive study on the behavior of students in online classes during COVID-19 pandemic,” AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 2405, no. April, 2022, doi: 10.1063/5.0073115.
B. Hollister, P. Nair, S. Hill-Lindsay, and L. Chukoskie, “Engagement in Online Learning: Student Attitudes and Behavior During COVID-19,” Front. Educ., vol. 7, no. May, 2022, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2022.851019.
C. E. (Betty) Cragg, J. Dunning, and J. Ellis, “Teacher and Student Behaviors in Face-to-Face and On-LinenCourses: Dealing with Complex Concepts,” J. Distance Educ., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 115–128, 2008.
A. W. Irawan, D. Dwisona, and M. Lestari, “Psychological Impacts of Students on Online Learning During the Pandemic COVID-19,” KONSELI J. Bimbing. dan Konseling, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 53–60, May 2020, doi: 10.24042/KONS.V7I1.6389.
I. Yuzulia, “The Challenges of Online Learning during Pandemic: Students’ Voice,” Wanastra J. Bhs. dan Sastra, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 08–12, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.31294/W.V13I1.9759.
B. Duraković and M. Halilovic, “Industry 4.0: The New Quality Management Paradigm in Era of the Industrial Internet of Things,” Int. J. Informatics Vis., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 580–587, 2023, doi: 10.30630/joiv.7.2.1738.
C. Garcia and N. Lemos, “The Gamification of E-learning Environments for Learning Programming,” Int. J. Informatics Vis., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 455–462, 2023, doi: 10.30630/joiv.7.2.1602.
D. T. H. Dung, "The Advantages and Disadvantages of Virtual Learning," IOSR J. Res. Method Educ., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 45–48, 2020, doi: 10.9790/7388-1003054548.
R. Firmansyah, D. M. Putri, M. G. S. Wicaksono, S. F. Putri, and Ahmad Arif Widianto, “The University Students’ Perspectives on the Advantages and Disadvantages of Online Learning Due to COVID-19,” in Proceeding of 2nd Annual Management, Business and Economic Conference (AMBEC 2020), 2021, pp. 120–124.
J. Ponto, “Understanding and Evaluating Survey Research,” J. Adv. Pract. Oncol., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 168–171, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4601897/pdf/jadp-06-168.pdf.
S. J. Stratton, “Population Research: Convenience Sampling Strategies,” Prehosp. Disaster Med., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 373–374, 2021, doi: 10.1017/S1049023X21000649.
A. Galloway, “Non-Probability Sampling,” Encyclopedia of Social Measurement. Elsevier, New York, pp. 859–864, 2005, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-369398-5/00382-0.
A. Wax, “To Zoom or not to Zoom,” Soc. Photo Opt. Instrum. Eng., vol. 61, no. 6, 2022, doi: 10.1117/1.oe.61.6.060101.
M. Y. Salam and A. Mudinilllah, “Zoom Meet: Alternative Media for Supporting Arabic Language Learning During the Pandemic,” Arab. J. Arab. Stud., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 13–24, 2022, doi: 10.24865/ajas.v7i1.404.
D. Serhan, “Transitioning from Face-to-Face to Remote Learning: Students’ Attitudes and Perceptions of using Zoom during COVID-19 Pandemic,” Int. J. Technol. Educ. Sci., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 335–342, 2020, doi: 10.46328/ijtes.v4i4.148.
“Enabling Focus mode for meetings,” Zoom Support, 2022. https://support.zoom.us/hc/en-us/articles/11771128877709-Enabling-Focus-mode-for-meetings (accessed Aug. 21, 2023).
A. Herdiansyah and Y. N. Fajriah, “Lecturers’ Challenges in Teaching EFL Online Using Zoom Cloud Meeting,” J. English Pedagog. Appl. Linguist., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2022.
F. R. Castelli and M. A. Sarvary, “Why students do not turn on their video cameras during online classes and an equitable and inclusive plan to encourage them to do so,” Ecol. Evol., 2021, doi: 10.1002/ece3.7123.
S. Oktaviani, “Online Lectures Using Zoom Application For Undergraduate Students During Covid-19 Pandemic Period,” Risenologi, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 31–36, 2021, doi: 10.47028/j.risenologi.2021.61.156.
A. Destianingsih and A. Satria, “Investigating Students’ Needs for Effective English Online Learning During Covid-19 for Polbeng Students,” ELT-Lectura, vol. 7, no. 2, 2020, doi: 10.31849/elt-lectura.v7i2.4657.
W. Setiawan, “Era Digital dan Tantangannya,” Semin. Nas. Pendidik., pp. 1–9, 2017.
Gunawan., N. M. Yeni, and S. Fathoroni, “Variations of Models and Learning Platforms for Prospective Teachers During the COVID-19 Pandemic Period,” vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 75–94, 2020.
Z. Almahasees, K. Mohsen, and M. O. Amin, “Faculty’s and Students’ Perceptions of Online Learning During COVID-19,” Front. Educ., vol. 6, p. 119, May 2021, doi: 10.3389/FEDUC.2021.638470/XML/NLM.
V. Ramachandran, “Stanford researchers identify four causes for ‘Zoom fatigue’ and their simple fixes,” Standford News, Feb. 23, 2021.
M. Bonfert et al., “Seeing the faces is so important—Experiences from online team meetings on commercial virtual reality platforms,” Front. Virtual Real., vol. 3, no. January, pp. 1–19, 2023, doi: 10.3389/frvir.2022.945791.
K. Tammaru, “Analysis of Communication in Virtual Meetings BT - Explorations in Dynamic Semiosis,” E. M. Tragel, Ed. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024, pp. 235–250.
E. M. van der Eijk and O. Stavrova, “The effect of video on performance and conflict.” 2022, [Online]. Available: https://arno.uvt.nl/show.cgi?fid=158359.