Visualization and Analysis of Safe Routes to School based on Risk Index using Student Survey Data for Safe Mobility

Wenquan Jin - Jeju National University, 102 Jejudaehak-ro, Jeju, 63243, Republic of Korea
Azimbek Khudoyberdiev - Jeju National University, 102 Jejudaehak-ro, Jeju, 63243, Republic of Korea
Dohyeun Kim - Jeju National University, 102 Jejudaehak-ro, Jeju, 63243, Republic of Korea


Citation Format:



DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30630/joiv.6.3.1163

Abstract


Risk analysis is important in heterogeneous industrial domains to enable sustainable development. Data is the basis for emphasizing the potential risk elements for improving efficiency, quality, and safety. For supplying safe routes to schools based on risk analysis, the risk assessment of routes is one of the widely used and very effective methodologies to filter the most dangerous roads, intersections, or specific points on roads. This paper presents a visualization and analysis of the risk assessment approach based on the risk index model using geographical information, including routes, danger points, and student survey data. The proposed risk index model is used for deriving a risk index based on geographical information, including danger points and a route's path. The model includes an equation to calculate the distance of danger points to the path using the coordinates of each location. The survey data is mainly comprised of route and survey information that is analyzed and preprocessed for the input data of the risk index model. The survey mainly consists of basic information on the route, survey participants, school route information, and school route coordinates. The data is classified into the school route data set and the school route danger points data set, and these values are applied to the analysis and the risk index model. Also, the risk index model is designed and developed through the analysis of routes.

Keywords


Risk analysis; risk index; safe routes to school; data pre-processing; data analysis.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Allen, F. R. (2018). The Management of Risk to Society from Potential Accidents: The Main Report of the UKAEA Working Group on the Risks to Society from Potential Major Accidents. Chapman and Hall/CRC.

Kanuganti, S., Agarwala, R., Dutta, B., Bhanegaonkar, P. N., Singh, A. P., & Sarkar, A. K. (2017). Road safety analysis using multi criteria approach: A case study in India. Transportation research procedia, 25, 4649-4661.

Rathi, R. (2018). Road traffic accidents–burden on society. EC Orthopaedics, 9, 30-33.

Mittal, N., 2011. Vehicle safety: Impediments to Road safety audits in India, Central Road Research Institute, (1st ed.), Traffic Infratech magazine, pp-9. Retrieved from http://www.trafficinfratech.com// Last accessed: Sep 23, 2014.

Huang, H., Yin, Q., Schwebel, D. C., Ning, P., & Hu, G. (2017). Availability and consistency of health and non-health data for road traffic fatality: Analysis of data from 195 countries, 1985–2013. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 108, 220-226.

Hyder, A. A., Paichadze, N., Toroyan, T., & Peden, M. M. (2017). Monitoring the decade of action for global road safety 2011–2020: an update. Global public health, 12(12), 1492-1505.

Schepers, P., Twisk, D., Fishman, E., Fyhri, A., & Jensen, A. (2017). The Dutch road to a high level of cycling safety. Safety science, 92, 264-273.

Cioca, L. I., & Ivascu, L. (2017). Risk indicators and road accident analysis for the period 2012–2016. Sustainability, 9(9), 1530.

Wang, J., Huang, H., & Zeng, Q. (2017). The effect of zonal factors in estimating crash risks by transportation modes: Motor vehicle, bicycle and pedestrian. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 98, 223-231.

D. Lord and F. Mannering, "The statistical analysis of crash-frequency data: a review and assessment of methodological alternatives," Transportation research part A: policy and practice, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 291–305, 2010.

Parkinson, S., Ward, P., Wilson, K., & Miller, J. (2017). Cyber threats facing autonomous and connected vehicles: Future challenges. IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems, 18(11), 2898-2915

Engström, J., Bärgman, J., Nilsson, D., Seppelt, B., Markkula, G., Piccinini, G. B., & Victor, T. (2018). Great expectations: a predictive processing account of automobile driving. Theoretical issues in ergonomics science, 19(2), 156-194.

Larsson, P., Dekker, S. W., & Tingvall, C. (2010). The need for a systems theory approach to road safety. Safety science, 48(9), 1167-1174.

Park, S., Bang, S., Kim, H., & Kim, H. (2018). Patch-based crack detection in black box road images using deep learning. In ISARC. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (Vol. 35, pp. 1-4). IAARC Publications.

Straub, E. R., & Schaefer, K. E. (2019). It takes two to tango: Automated vehicles and human beings do the dance of driving–four social considerations for policy. Transportation research part A: policy and practice, 122, 173-183.

Madigan, R., Nordhoff, S., Fox, C., Amini, R. E., Louw, T., Wilbrink, M., ... & Merat, N. (2019). Understanding interactions between Automated Road Transport Systems and other road users: A video analysis. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 66, 196-213.

ElNashar, E. A., & Zlatev, Z. (2018). Analysis of data from software sensor for smart airbags deployment. Adv Robot Autom, 7(181), 2.

Shimazaki, K., Ito, T., Fujii, A., & Ishida, T. (2018). The public's understanding of the functionality and limitations of automatic braking in Japan. IATSS research, 42(4), 221-229.

Maqbool, Y., Sethi, A., & Singh, J. (2019). Road safety and Road Accidents: An Insight. International Journal of Information And Computing Science, Volume, 6, 93-105.

Russo, F., & Comi, A. (2017). From the analysis of European accident data to safety assessment for planning: the role of good vehicles in urban area. European transport research review, 9(1), 9.

Russo, Francesco, and Antonio Comi. "Providing dynamic route advice for urban goods vehicles: the learning process enhanced by the emerging technologies." Transportation Research Procedia 62 (2022): 632-639.